SKSM’s grievance process treats complainants and respondents equitably, provides an objective evaluation of all relevant evidence, and includes the procedural protections outlined below. Upon receiving a formal complaint, SKSM will provide written notice to known parties and investigate the allegations by gathering evidence and interviewing parties and witnesses. SKSM bears the burden of proof and of gathering evidence.
A. Notice to Parties
Upon receiving a formal complaint, SKSM will provide written notice to known parties including:
- Notice of the grievance process, including any informal resolution process;
- Notice of the allegations, including sufficient details (identity of parties involved, conduct alleged, date and location of conduct) and time to prepare a response;
- Statement that the respondent is not presumed to be responsible and that responsibility is determined at the conclusion of the grievance process;
- Notice that parties may have an advisor of choice who may be an attorney;
- Notice of provisions in SKSM’s code of conduct prohibiting knowingly making false statements or submitting false information; and
- Additional notice of any new allegations that arise during the investigation.
B. Dismissal of Complaints
If the allegations, if proven, would not constitute gender-based misconduct, SKSM must dismiss the formal complaint as a violation of this policy. The conduct may still be addressed under another policy or code of conduct. SKSM may dismiss a complaint if:
- Complainant withdraws the complaint in writing;
- Respondent is no longer enrolled at or employed by SKSM; or
- Circumstances prevent SKSM from gathering sufficient evidence to reach a determination.
SKSM will promptly and simultaneously send written notice of any dismissal to the parties, including the reason for dismissal. Parties can appeal a dismissal as outlined in Section VI.H. below.
C. Consolidation
SKSM may consolidate formal complaints of allegations against more than one respondent, by more than one complainant against one or more respondents, or by one party against the other party, where the allegations arise out of the same facts or circumstances.
D. Advisors
Parties may have an advisor present at any grievance proceeding, including the opportunity to be accompanied by an advisor of choice to any related meeting or proceeding. SKSM may establish restrictions on advisors’ participation in proceedings as long as the restrictions apply equally to both parties.
E. Informal Resolution
SKSM may offer informal resolution options (mediation, restorative justice, etc.) if a formal complaint is filed, as long as both parties give voluntary, informed written consent. Any party may withdraw from informal resolution at any time prior to agreeing to a resolution. This option is not available and cannot be used to resolve sexual assault cases.
F. Investigation
If not dismissed or resolved through informal resolution, SKSM will investigate the allegations in the formal complaint. SKSM bears the burden of gathering evidence sufficient to reach a determination. The investigator will interview parties, gather relevant evidence, provide parties an opportunity to present witnesses and evidence, and create an investigative report that fairly summarizes the evidence and when appropriate, reaches fact and violation conclusions and/or recommended remedies. “When appropriate” includes when SKSM does not plan to hold a live hearing.
Prior to completing the investigative report, SKSM will send to each party and advisor the evidence for inspection and review, and the parties will have 10 days to submit a written response, which the investigator will consider prior to completion of the report. SKSM will make the evidence available at any hearing for reference by the parties.
After finalizing the report, SKSM will send it to each party and advisor at least 10 days prior to a hearing for their review and written response.
When there is no live hearing, the Dean of Students is the decision-maker unless the Dean of Students has a material conflict of interest or bias, in which case the President will appoint another person. When there is a live hearing, the hearing officer is the decision-maker. The hearing officer is appointed by the Dean of Students.
G. Live Hearings
SKSM has the discretion to require a live hearing as part of the grievance process if it deems doing so is required or permitted by California law or by other SKSM policies or is in the best interest at arriving at a just outcome, such as when witness credibility is particularly material and disputed. The hearing may be conducted with parties in the same location or, at SKSM’s direction, virtually with technology enabling the parties to see and hear each other simultaneously. Mutually agreed rules on the usage of cameras, microphones, and live chat may be determined in advance. The hearing officer will be appointed by the Dean of Students from among persons who have no material conflict of interest or bias and can include a third party quasi-judicial professional.
Only relevant cross-examination and other questions may be asked of a party or witness. The decision-maker will determine relevance before a party or witness answers each question. If they decide to exclude a question, they must explain the decision. Questions about a complainant’s prior sexual history are generally not relevant.
If a party or a material witness does not submit to cross-examination at the hearing, the decision-maker cannot rely on any statement of that party or witness in reaching a determination. However, the decision-maker cannot draw an inference about responsibility based solely on a party’s or witness’s absence from the hearing or refusal to answer questions.
SKSM will create an audio or audiovisual recording or transcript of any live hearing and make it available to parties for inspection and review.
H. Determination
The decision-maker will issue a written determination of responsibility based on the preponderance of the evidence standard (more likely than not).
The written determination will include:
- Identification of the allegations;
- Description of procedural steps taken (notifications, interviews, site visits, methods of evidence gathering, hearings);
- Findings of fact;
- Application of SKSM policy to the facts;
- A rationale for the result of each allegation and determination of responsibility;
- Disciplinary sanctions imposed on respondent;
- Whether remedies will be provided to complainant; and
- Appeal procedures and bases.
The determination will be provided to the parties simultaneously. It becomes final on the date the parties receive the written determination of the appeal, if an appeal is filed, or on the date on which an appeal would no longer be timely.
I. Appeals
Either party may appeal from a determination or dismissal on the following bases:
- Procedural irregularity that affected the outcome;
- New evidence not reasonably available at the time of determination that could affect the outcome;
- Conflict of interest or bias by the Title IX Coordinator, investigator, or decision-maker that affected the outcome; or
- Any other bases offered equally to both parties.
Appeals must be submitted in writing to the Dean of Students within 5 (five) business days of receiving the written determination or dismissal. If an appeal is filed, SKSM will notify the other party and ensure that the appeal officer is not the same person involved in the grievance process previously. Both parties will have a reasonable, equal opportunity to submit a written statement supporting or challenging the outcome.
The appeal officer will issue a written decision describing the result of the appeal and rationale and provide the decision simultaneously to both parties.
J. Timeframe
SKSM aims to complete the grievance process within 60-90 business days, excluding appeals. Extensions may be granted for good cause with written notice to the parties.
K. Sanctions and Remedies
Sanctions for respondents determined to have violated this policy may include warning, probation, suspension, expulsion, transcript notification, termination of employment, or restrictions on access to campus, programs or courses.
Remedies for complainants may include counseling, extensions of deadlines, modifications of work or class schedules, leaves of absence, and other measures designed to help the complainant succeed in their education program.